Durbin, Murray, Warren Lead Group Of Senators Calling On Education Department To Explain Delay Of Gainful Employment Rule
Senators argue delay hurts students and needlessly stalls important protections for taxpayers
WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Dick Durbin (D-IL), Patty Murray (D-WA), and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) called on Education Secretary Betsy DeVos to explain the Department’s decision to delay the implementation of the Gainful Employment (GE) rule, which requires career training programs to provide students with reasonable return on their educational investment – good-paying jobs that allow them to repay their student debt. Last week, the Department of Education announced it would postpone the deadline for failing schools to submit appeals of their debt-to-earnings rates and use a new disclosure template to provide students better information about their programs.
“The Gainful Employment rule is a critical protection for both students and taxpayers. It will encourage improvement of career education programs that fail to adequately prepare students for good paying jobs that allow them to repay their student debt, and cut off federal financial aid to programs that continue to fall short of these reasonable expectations. This will help prevent students from amassing debt that they can’t repay and reduce taxpayer dollars being wasted on underperforming programs,” wrote the senators in a letter to DeVos. “Disappointingly, [the Department] has now moved the March and April deadlines back to July 1, 2017, on the grounds that the delay will allow time to ‘further review’ the regulation… [T]his delay needlessly stalls important protections for students and taxpayers and creates more uncertainty for schools.”
In addition to Durbin, Murray, and Warren, the letter was also signed by Senators Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Jack Reed (D-RI), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Al Franken (D-MN), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Brian Schatz (D-HI), Chris Murphy (D-CT), and Maggie Hassan (D-NH).
Federal law requires career education and certificate programs at for-profit, not-for-profit, and public institutions to prepare students for “gainful employment in a recognized occupation” in order to qualify for federal student aid. The Department’s Gainful Employment rule seeks to hold institutions to that statutory responsibility. Final debt-to-earnings data released by the Obama Administration in January revealed that 98 percent of the 800 failing degree programs identified were offered by for-profit colleges.
Full text of the letter is available here and below:
March 13, 2017
The Honorable Elisabeth DeVos
Department of Education
400 Maryland Ave, SW
Washington, DC 20202
Dear Secretary DeVos:
We write today regarding our serious concerns over the Department of Education’s (ED) announcement delaying implementation of the Gainful Employment (GE) rule.
The Gainful Employment rule is a critical protection for both students and taxpayers. It will encourage improvement of career education programs that fail to adequately prepare students for good paying jobs that allow them to repay their student debt, and cut off federal financial aid to programs that continue to fall short of these reasonable expectations. This will help prevent students from amassing debt that they can’t repay and reduce taxpayer dollars being wasted on underperforming programs.
On January 9, 2017, the Department of Education released final Debt-to-Earnings (D/E) rates for all GE programs at public, non-profit, and for-profit schools. These rates were generated using earnings data from the Social Security Administration and data on program completers reported by institutions. GE afforded schools two opportunities to formally challenge ED’s calculations of their data before the January 9 release.
The rule, generously, gives schools a third opportunity for appeal after the release of final D/E rates. Schools can submit alternate earnings data for “failing” or “zone” (near-failing) programs if that data will improve the program’s rate significantly enough to avoid sanctions. The deadline for colleges to notify ED of their intent to file an alternate earnings appeal was January 23. Schools then had until March 10 – more than six weeks – to submit their final appeals.
In addition, schools were required to begin using the new GE Disclosure Template by April 3. This new and improved template includes a more meaningful completion rate, the typical earnings of graduates, whether a program meets state licensure requirements, and a prominent warning for failing programs that do not have appeals pending. The GE Disclosure Template will help students be better informed consumers.
Disappointingly, ED has now moved the March and April deadlines back to July 1, 2017, on the grounds that the delay will allow time to “further review” the regulation. According to a Department spokesperson, the delay was also due to “a question about whether schools can provide data to a third party.” It is unclear how this question could not have been solved through follow-up guidance rather than delay. The Department has already gone through an extensive federal rulemaking process and the Gainful Employment rule has been upheld by federal courts. Therefore, this delay needlessly stalls important protections for students and taxpayers and creates more uncertainty for schools.
As such, we seek your answers to the following questions:
· Why did the Department delay the deadline for schools to file alternate earnings appeals and use the GE Disclosure Template?
· What is the scope of the Department’s current “review” of the GE regulations and their implementation?
· Did ED explore alternative options to the delay for resolving any questions about the use of data by third-parties, including issuing guidance?
· Of the programs for which the Department received notice of an intent to appeal by January 23, 2017, how many alternate earnings appeals have been submitted to the Department as of the date of this letter?
· What is the timeline for the Department to resolve all of the alternate earnings appeals received by July 1, 2017?
· Will you commit to swiftly enforce the requirement, which took effect February 8, that institutions provide warnings to current and prospective students for failing programs where no notice of an intent to appeal was received by January 23, 2017?
· Will you commit to requiring schools to use the new GE Disclosure Template no later than July 1, 2017?
· Will you commit to no further delays in the Department’s implementation and enforcement of GE?
Implementation of this rule is an important part of your responsibility as Secretary to protect students and appropriately oversee taxpayer dollars. In fact, in recent testimony before a House subcommittee, Department of Education Inspector General Kathleen Tighe agreed that “the gainful employment rule is a good rule in terms of protecting kids and protecting taxpayers’ dollars.” Further delays or other attempts to undermine Gainful Employment implementation are unacceptable.
We look forward to your prompt response to our questions.
Previous Article Next Article